Introduction

A dying declaration is a statement made by a person who is on the verge of death, relating to the cause of or the circumstances surrounding their death. Indian law treats such statements as a recognised exception to the general rule against hearsay evidence, on the principle encapsulated in the Latin maxim nemo moriturus praesumitur mentiri — a person on the point of death is presumed not to lie.

Dying declarations occupy a unique and weighty position in Indian criminal jurisprudence. Unlike many other pieces of evidence, a properly recorded and credible dying declaration can, by itself, be the sole basis for conviction — without any requirement of corroboration.

Legal Provisions

Section 26, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) — Corresponds to Section 32(1), Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA):

Statements, written or verbal, of relevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found, or who has become incapable of giving evidence, or whose attendance cannot be procured without an amount of delay or expense which under the circumstances of the case appears to the Court unreasonable, are themselves relevant facts in the following cases: — (1) When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person’s death comes into question.

Key Principles

•  Dying declarations are admissible under Section 26 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), which replaced Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with effect from 1 July 2024. The substantive law on dying declarations is unchanged.

•  A dying declaration may be oral, written, or even made through gestures, signs, or nods, provided the communication is positive and definite.

•  There is no mandatory requirement for a dying declaration to be recorded by a Magistrate; however, where circumstances permit, Magistrate-recorded declarations are preferred for their reliability.

•  A fitness certificate from a doctor is not a compulsory prerequisite; what matters is that the declarant was in a fit mental and physical state to make the statement at the time it was recorded.

•  A dying declaration does not require corroboration. If the court is fully satisfied of its truthfulness and voluntariness, it may convict solely on the basis of the declaration.

•  Where multiple dying declarations are made and they are inconsistent, the court must carefully evaluate all of them and assign reasons for accepting or rejecting any particular statement.

Landmark Cases

 Pakala Narayana Swami v. Emperor (1939)

This pre-independence Privy Council ruling remains the bedrock of Indian evidence law. Justice Atkin widely interpreted the phrase “circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death.” The deceased had told his wife he was travelling to Berhampur to collect a debt from the accused’s wife. His body was later found in a trunk. The court held that statements made by a person before any injury is inflicted—provided they have a proximate relation to the final occurrence—are admissible as dying declarations, regardless of whether the declarant expected death at that moment.

 Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay (1958)

This landmark judgment clarified the evidentiary weight of a dying declaration, establishing that it does not inherently suffer from any weakness. The Supreme Court ruled that there is no absolute rule of law or prudence requiring a dying declaration to be corroborated by other evidence. If the court is fully satisfied after close scrutiny that the declaration is truthful, voluntary, and uninfluenced by tutoring, a conviction can be based solely on it. The case set the benchmark criteria for testing its reliability, such as lighting conditions and the opportunity for observation.

 Queen-Empress v. Abdullah (1885)

This historic full-bench decision of the Allahabad High Court legally validated non-verbal dying declarations. The deceased girl, whose throat had been brutally cut, was unable to speak. When asked questions by the police and witnesses, she identified her attacker through clear signs and hand gestures. The High Court held that if an injured person is completely unable to articulate words or write, their positive and definite gestures, nods, or signs constitute a valid and admissible dying declaration under the law.

 Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984)

In this highly complex case involving marital cruelty and cyanide poisoning, the Supreme Court deeply explored the test of “proximity” regarding statements under Section 32(1). The court ruled that letters written by a married woman to her relatives detailing her ill-treatment and mental agony months before her death are admissible as dying declarations. It established that Indian law differs from English law; the declarant does not need to be under immediate expectation of death when making the statement.

 Laxman v. State of Maharashtra (2002)

A crucial Constitution Bench ruling settled a lingering procedural debate regarding medical certifications. The Supreme Court held that a formal fitness certificate from a doctor is not a mandatory prerequisite to validate a dying declaration. The ultimate test is whether the declarant was physically and mentally fit to make a coherent statement. If the Magistrate recording the statement proves through credible testimony that the deceased was fully conscious and aware, the declaration remains completely valid even without a medical endorsement.

Conclusion

The law of dying declarations, as it stands under Section 26 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, reflects a considered balance between the imperatives of justice and the realities of human frailty in extremis. Courts continue to apply these principles with care, recognising that a dying declaration is not merely evidence — it is often the last voice of a victim seeking justice.

Join our WhatsApp Groups ( Click Here) and Telegram Channel ( Click Here) and get instant notifications.